Legal Opinion
Paul Sachs Originals Co. v. John Sachs and Leo Hirsch, Doing Business as Sachs of California, a Partnership
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 21, 1963No. 18774PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, sitting without a jury, dismissing appellant’s :suit for injunction, accounting, and damages for trademark infringement and unfair competition. The district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are published in a memorandum of decision, 217 F.Supp. 407 (S.D.Cal.1963). Jurisdiction of this court is based on section 39 of the Trademark Act of 1946, 60 Stat. 400, 15 U.S.C. § 1121 (1958), and on 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1958).
Since 1942, appellant and its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Plough, Inc. v. Kreis Laboratories, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Chester Barrie, Ltd. v. the Chester Laurie, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Paul Sachs Originals Co. v. SachsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1963
3Cited by24 opinions
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re National Data CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- The J. B. Williams Company, Inc. v. Le Conte Cosmetics, Inc., and Elton C. Toland and Lenore TolandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.