Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State of Tennessee

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided September 28, 1972No. C-72-241PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WELLFORD, District Judge.

It should be noted that the Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 92 S.Ct. 1983, 32 L.Ed.2d 556 (1972) decision was a 4-3 decision of the Supreme Court, the effect of which was to declare unconstitutional under the due process clause of the Constitution replevin laws of the States of Florida and of Pennsylvania. Justice White wrote in that case a strong and compelling dissenting opinion in which the Chief Justice and Justice Blackmun joined. Interestingly the two three Judge Courts which had considered these cases upheld the constitutionality of these…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Long v. LevinsonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
  2. Roberta J. Huber, AKA Roberta Chris Holter v. Union Planters National Bank of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  3. Rags, Inc. v. Thoroughbred Motor Cars, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. Roberta J. Huber, AKA Roberta Chris Holter v. Union Planters National Bank of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API