Legal Opinion
United States v. James Ralph Hoyland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 14, 1990No. 89-50253PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
James R. Hoyland appeals his conviction of structuring his bank deposits with the intent of preventing the bank from reporting a deposit of $10,000 or more, 31 U.S.C. § 5324(3). In this case of first impression in this circuit, we affirm his conviction.
FACTS
The parties stipulated to the facts as follows:
JAMES HOYLAND is charged with having engaged in currency transactions in United States currency with various financial institutions in amounts less than $10,-000 in order to avoid the bank’s filing of a currency transaction report (CTR). He opened a bank account with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Nir Goldeshtein v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Errol J. Jackson, Milton L. Freeman, and Frenchie R. BeckumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Mickens, Anthony Jacobs, Shelby Kearney, Bettina Jacobs Celifie, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.