Legal Opinion

People v. Kristy

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1935No. Crim. 3899PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, J.

Appellants Kristy and Mackay, together with one Fred Landers, were charged with offenses described in eleven counts of an indictment. Appellants, tried separately from their codefendant, were by the jury convicted on all counts. Kristy and Mackay appeal from .the several judgments rendered against them and from the order denying their motion for a new trial. There was a fourth participant, one Rudolph Straight, acting with defendants -in the transactions on which the charges were founded.

Defendants and Straight, on the 16th day of January, 1935, were under lawful commitment confined in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. BealobaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. LaursenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. FouquetteNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. KendrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API