Legal Opinion
St. Pierre v. Dyer
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 25, 1998No. 1:96-cv-01616PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
HOMER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently pending are the motions of defendants Luke R. Dyer (“Dyer”), Coburn Insuring Agency, Inc. (“Coburn”) and Agents Service Corporation (“ASERCO”) for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Docket Nos. 25, 27 & 30. Also pending is a motion for summary judgment by Connecticut Indemnity on both the direct and third-party claims. Docket No. 47. For the reasons which follow, each motion is granted.
I. Background
Viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the facts presented on these motions are as follows.
A.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- St. Pierre v. DyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Andre St. Pierre v. DyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000