Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hulsey v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 23, 1958No. 36988Published

1DissentQuillian, Judge

I think the proximate cause is a jury question. See Rogers v. Johnson, 94 Ga. App. 666 (96 S. E. 2d 285); Associated Transports, Inc. v. Greeson, 94 Ga. App. 47 (93 S. E. 2d 417); Pitts v. Farlow, 94 Ga. App. 314 (94 S. E. 2d 391); Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Coxwell, 93 Ga. App. 159 (2) (91 S. E. 2d 135). The main case in which it is made to plainly appear the rule is different is where a plaintiff drives into a stationary object and where a driver over whom he has no control does so is Pittman v. Staples, 95 Ga. App. 187 (97 S. E. 2d 630). A very similar case to the one at bar is Georgia…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CoxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Rogers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Pittman v. StaplesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Associated Transports, Inc. v. GreesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API