Splawn v. Zavala
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
Appellants Arthur and Janet Splawn have moved this Court for an extension of time in which to file their cost bond. We will overrule the motion.
Summary judgment was rendered and signed against appellants in the district court of Travis County of January 1, 1983. Motion for new trial was timely filed; therefore, the cost bond was due to be filed in the district court on April 4,1983, ninety days after the summary judgment was signed. Tex.R.Civ.P.Ann. 356(a) (Supp. 1983). Appellants had fifteen days thereafter, until April 19, 1983, to file their motion for extension of time reasonably…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. YendreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Byars v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- Inman's Corp. v. Transamerica Commercial Finance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Amegy Bank of Texas, N.A. v. Titan Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- Amegy Bank of Texas, N.A. v. Titan Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- Amegy Bank of Texas, N.A. v. Titan Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- Inman's Corp. v. Transamerica Commercial Finance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.