Legal Opinion
State v. Wofford
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 18, 2009No. 36444-1-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
¶1 Donald Anainise Wofford appeals his conviction of violating a domestic violence no-contact order. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, arguing that the State failed to prove that his conduct was a crime under former RCW 26.50.110(1) (2006) and that he had previous convictions that elevated the crime to a felony under RCW 26.50.110(5).1 Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
*874FACTS
¶2 On July 8, 2005, a Pierce County commissioner executed a no-contact order under chapters 10.99 and 26.50 RCW prohibiting Wofford from having any contact “directly or indirectly, in person, in writing,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Department of Labor & Industries v. SlaughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.