Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Webb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 4, 1913No. 4128PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Complaint—appeal; from Elbert superior court—Judge Meador. March Í4, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. The defendant may amend his plea by verifying it, even - after the first term. Neal v. Davis Foundry and Machine Works, 131 Ga. 703 (63 S. E. 221), and citations.

2. The trial judge did not err in granting a new trial; not only because it was the first new trial and authorized under the evidence, in the exercise of his sound discretion, but also because the evidence authorized, even if it did not demand, a finding different from that returned by the jury.

3. A married voman who is living with her husband ’ can not be held liable on in account for necessaries furnished herself and children,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neal v. Davis Foundry & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Freeman v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Butler v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Scott v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. McKee v. Popular Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Georgia Grocery Co. v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. Arnold v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API