Legal Opinion

Aragon v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1981No. 5408PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appellant here questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction of the crime of robbery. The specified error is the failure of the trial court to grant his Motion for Judgment of Acquittal. The appellant contends that the victim’s testimony of the events surrounding the robbery including her positive identification of the appellant, coupled with admissions made by the appellant to another inmate at the county jail, does not constitute sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction. We shall affirm the judgment and sentence entered in the trial court.

On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cloman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Russell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Boyd v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Montez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Adebowale Oluseyi Adekale A/K/A Ted AdekaleWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Haight v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Carfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Murray v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API