Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Iowa Board of Optometry Examiners

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1991No. 90-755PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether the State of Iowa is a party in a contested case proceeding before the Board of Optometry Examiners (board). After the board had issued its amended decision and order, the licensee filed a petition for judicial review in district court. The State, through the attorney general, filed a petition for intervention claiming it had a right to intervene in the proceeding. The district court denied intervention. We reverse.

I. Scope of Review.

This appeal involves intervention as of right. Therefore, we review the district court’s denial of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motor Club of Iowa v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Application of Bank of RhameNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. MATTER OF ESTATE OF DeVOSSSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  4. Hartwig v. Board of NursingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Iowa Board of Optometry ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Strickland v. Iowa Board of MedicineCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2009
  3. Fisher v. Iowa Board of Optometry ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  4. Iowa Civil Rights Com'n v. Deere & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. Adam Klein v. Iowa Public Information Board and Burlington Police Department and Iowa Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal InvestigationsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API