Legal Opinion
Cary v. Mayor of North Plainfield
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 15, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions
• On certiorari to the mayor of the borough of North Plain-field.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
The prosecutor was a resident -of the city of Plainfield, where he had a stand as cartman, to conduct which business he was licensed by that municipality. On November 2d, 1885, he was hired in the city to go into the borough of North Plainfield for two loads of furniture, to be carried from the borough into the city. For fulfilling this contract he was charged with a violation of an ordinance of the borough “for the licensing and regulation of cartmen,” &c., which forbade any person to drive any truck for hire, within the limits of the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Pee Dee Chair Co. v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- White Oak Coal Co. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- City of LaGrange v. WhitleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- McDonald v. City of ParagouldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Ostroff v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CITY OF CAMDENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.