Underwood
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.
Mother appeals a denial of her motion to modify an award of custody of her child, M, from her father and stepmother (grandparents) to her. She asserts that the trial court erroneously applied ORS 109.119(2)(c) to this proceeding or, alternatively, if the court properly applied ORS 109.119(2)(c), that statute is unconstitutional as applied to this circumstance.1 She further argues that the *186trial court erred in requiring her to demonstrate that a change of circumstance had occurred and that an award of custody to her was in the child’s best interests, or that, if the court properly required…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. S. T. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. KammeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. KammeyerOregon Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. TardioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- KleinsasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- In re the Marriage of SouthardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015