United States v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren
The question here is whether Section 811 (g) (2) (A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 is constitutional as applied in this case. That section, the “payment of premiums” provision in the 1939 Code, requires inclusion of insurance proceeds in the gross estate of an insured where the proceeds are receivable by beneficiaries other than the executor but are attributable to premiums paid by the insured. Inclusion is required regardless of whether the insured retained any policy rights. However, if the insured possessed no “incidents of ownership” after January 10, 1941, the premiums paid by him…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- John M. Quarty, Personal Representative of the Estate of Angele C. Quarty Elizabeth B. Cherne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Estate of J. William Bahen, Deceased, Kathleen Privett Bahen, Sole v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Belco Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Sakol v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- Estate of Arthur Chase Shafer, Deceased, Chase Shafer, Co-Executor, and Resor Shafer, Co-Executor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.