Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1936No. [No. 52, October Term, 1935.]PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

The traverser has appealed from a sentence imposed upon him after conviction of the crime of bastardy. His appeal is based, first, upon a denial of jurisdiction in the nisi prius court; and, secondly, upon alleged error in the refusal to withdraw a juror and declare a mistrial because of the prejudicial effect of a remark in the argument of the case to the jury; and, thirdly, upon the legal sufficiency of the evidence to convict. The third assignment of error cannot be entertained in a criminal case, because the Constitution of Maryland makes the jury the sole judge of the law and the facts.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Dick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  3. Toomer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  4. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  5. Rasin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Veney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API