Legal Opinion

Sakabu v. Regency Construction Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 2012No. ED 97934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, Judge.

Stanley Sakabu and Cindy Province (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Regency Construction Co., Inc. (“Regency”). On appeal, Plaintiffs argue a genuine issue of material fact existed, the trial court failed to resolve a disputed issue of material fact, and the trial court misinterpreted Missouri law. We reverse and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs entered into a contract with Regency wherein Regency agreed to serve as general contractor to renovate Plaintiffs’ home. Regency hired a subcontractor, Kirsch Plumbing, Inc.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Smith v. Inter-County Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Thornburg v. Federal Express Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ryann Spencer Group, Inc. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Sloan v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jefferson ex rel. Jefferson v. Missouri Baptist Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Wells v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
  3. Weltmer v. Signature Health Services Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Carter v. KhayrullaevDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
  5. Dr. John B. Weltmer, Jr. v. Signature Health Services Inc. f/k/a Premier Care, Inc., St. Louis County Orthopedic Group Inc., SLCOG Property Management & Leasing Company, LLC, and Premier Care Leasing, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API