Legal Opinion

United States v. Sapulpa Brick and Tile Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1956No. 5460_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Sapulpa Brick and Tile Corporation 1 brought this action against the United States on a claim for refund of income taxes paid for the year 1953. The taxpayer is engaged in the business of mining brick and tile clay and processing it into burnt brick and tile. The taxpayer owns in fee simple a tract of land upon which its clay pit and brick and tile plant are located. In making burnt brick and tile, the taxpayer carries out the following processes:(a) The clay is mined by a power shovel and loaded into dump cars which carry the clay to the plant adjoining the clay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Cherokee Brick & Tile CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. T. L. Townsend, Acting District Director of Internal Revenue v. The Hitchcock CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  3. Dragon Cement Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1990

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dragon Cement Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. Merry Brothers Brick and Tile Company, United States of America v. Reliance Clay Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Iowa Limestone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  5. R. A. Riddell, District Director of Internal Revenue, Los Angeles District v. Monolith Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API