Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Bartels

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 26, 2012No. Civ. No. 01-2024 (DRD)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge.

This case raises two significant issues:

First, did this Court err when, in 2001, it held that the one-year durational residency requirement to run for New Jersey State Senate and General Assembly contained in Article IV, Section 1, Paragraph 2 of the New Jersey State Constitution violates the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and enjoined the New *522Jersey Attorney General and Secretary of State from enforcing that provision? See Robertson v. Bartels, 150 F.Supp.2d 691 (D.N.J.2001)

Second, did the New Jersey State Supreme Court exceed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Barrow v. City of Detroit Election CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. OSWALD v. IRELAND-IMHOFDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API