Legal Opinion

Gulick v. Ward

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 15, 1828PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The facts in this caso a’re sufficiently developed in the opi¡¡ ions delivered.

Ewing, C. J.

This action was brought to recover the skit of (H)0, stipulated in a written agreement, to be paid by tin. defendants to the plaintiffs. Upon tho trial at the Circuit Cc'.ur the defendants insisted that the promise was void, because tluctmsideration was illegal, and the plaintiffs were therefore noi entitled to recover. The judge reserved the question for deter • miuation here, and a verdict was rendered for tho plaintiff, which the defendants now seek to set aside. The agree men’, between the parlies,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doolin v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  2. Perkins v. LymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Thompson v. DaviesNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Barker v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  5. Wilbur v. HowNew York Supreme Court · 1811

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Black Industries, Inc. v. BushDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API