Legal Opinion

McClinton 414503 v. Bauman

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 19, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00138Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION ______ TERRANCE TERRELL MCCLINTON, Petitioner, Case No. 2:24-cv-138 v. Honorable Maarten Vermaat CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Respondent. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Petitioner consented to proceed in all matters in this action under the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge. (ECF No. 4.) Section 636(c) provides that “[u]pon the consent of…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API