Legal Opinion · Dissent

First National Bank of Chicago v. Reno County Bank

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 11, 1880Published

Motion for new trial.

1Dissent

Foster, D. J.,

dissenting. 1 cannot concur with the circuit judge as to the law of this case. My views are fully presented *264in an opinion written on the former trial of the ease, and I need hut add a few lines more. It will be seen I then based my decision on the doctrine established by the supreme court in the case of Hoover, Assignee, v. Wise, 91 U. S. 308-13, and upon that case I now stand.

While it is true the facts in that case are not altogether similar to the facts here, yet that case did fairly present the question as to privity of action between the principal and an agent appointed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of the Metropolis v. President of the New England BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  2. Allen v. Merchant's BankCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  3. Hoover v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Thomas Wilson & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. Montgomery County Bank v. . Albany City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1852

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API