Legal Opinion
Fridman v. Fridman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 21, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yancey, J.), dated January 22, 2002, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, directed him to pay maintenance in the amount of $1,000 per month from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2007.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting the provision thereof directing the husband to pay maintenance from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2007, and substituting therefor a provision…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Loeb v. LoebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Ferraro v. FerraroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Markopoulos v. MarkopoulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grumet v. GrumetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Sevdinoglou v. SevdinoglouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Heiny v. HeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hamroff v. HamroffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Appel v. AppelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.