Legal Opinion

Mossy Motors v. McRedmond

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1943No. 17828PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A rehearing was granted because a majority of the present members of the court have grave doubt as to the soundness of the reasons given for the conclusion originally reached. After considering again all of the facts and legal questions presented by those facts, we now conclude that the decree originally rendered was correct, for reasons which we shall now set forth.

Wiley Mossy engaged in business as Mossy Motors and as such, dealing in automobiles, entered into a contract with Miss Bessie McRedmond for the purchase by her of a new Oldsmobile automobile together with certain special tires and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. H. T. Cottam & Co. v. MoisesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Mutual Rice Co. v. Star Bottling WorksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Bartley v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  4. C. F. Bonsor & Co. v. Simon Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. J. H. Garrison & Son v. Sherill Hardwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plaquemines Equipment & MacHine Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. Searcy v. Gulf Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Berry v. GinsburgLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. William M. Gillespie, Sr. v. W. A. Ranson Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API