Warren Weisberg as Partner, D/B/A Consolidated Chemical Works, Plaintiff v. Handy & Harman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Weisberg challenges the district court’s determination of the dollar value (price) the plaintiff was entitled to receive for a shipment of silver under an open price contract. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
The appellant, Warren Weisberg, is the managing agent and sole proprietor 1 of Consolidated Chemical Works, an Illinois corporation that produces detergent products and cleaning compounds. The defendant, Handy & Harman, is a New York corporation with headquarters in New York City. H & H has sales offices at various locations, including Elk…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Avern Trust v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- MADISON PARK BK. v. FieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Botti v. AVENUE BK. & TRUST CO. OF OAK PARKAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Minco Oil & Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
- Terry Kass v. PayPal Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. Man Industries (INDIA), Ltd, Prime Pipe International, Inc., and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Offices Togolais Des Phosphates v. Mulberry Phosphates, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
- T & S Brass and Bronze Works, Inc. v. Pic-Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.