Boynton v. State

1. Aground of a motion for a new trial complaining that the court-erred in refusing to rule out the ‘ ‘ purported statement of the deceased, . . when movéd to do so by counsel for defendant,” is not a sufficient assignment of error, for the reason that it does not set forth such statement, either literally or in substance, and the ground upon which the motion to rule it out was made.

Argued May 19, Decided June 4, 1902. Conviction of manslaughter. Before Judge Candler. Fulton superior court. April 12, 1902. Aldine Chambers and W. W. Futrell, for plaintiff in error. C. D. Hill,…