State v. Jimenez
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Poritz
This case presents an issue of first impression in New Jersey. In Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), the United States Supreme Court held that the execution of a mentally retarded person violates the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment found in the Eighth Amendment. Atkins left to the states the procedures to be followed by the courts when a capital defendant raises a claim of mental retardation. This case requires that we establish such procedures in New Jersey.
I
Ten-year-old W.C. of Morristown was reported missing after he failed to return…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Howell v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Commonwealth v. BraceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.