Mount v. Tappey
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 62 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM JEFFERSON COURT OP COMMON PLEAS. CITED 6 Bush, 20, Burks v. Wonterline, &c. Civil Code, section 369, subsections 3, 5. CITED Civil Code, section 58.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
deliveked the ovarios' op the coukt.
To the petition of the appellee in this action against C. L. Beid and the appellant, W. J. Mount, upon their joint promissory note, dated April 15, 1868, for eight hundred dollars, payable twelve months thereafter, with interest from date, Beid filed an answer stating the consideration of the note to have been a loan to him of seven hundred and four dollars, and that the excess of ninety-six dollars was a usurious “bonus,” exacted and included in the note for the loan, and *619he contested the action as to that sum, confessing the plaintiff’s right…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burks v. WonterlineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Trust & Savings Bank v. OteroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926