Legal Opinion

Richard Baker v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1994No. 93-1695PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and District Judge ELLIS joined.

OPINION

MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:

The instant case presents the issue of whether a longshore employee who sustains an occupational, noise-induced, monaural hearing loss may be compensated for a monaural loss or must instead have his loss converted into a binaural loss for purposes of calculating his benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, as amended. 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (1988).

Appellant, Richard Baker, has worked for Bethlehem Steel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. John Woodfork v. Marine Cooks & Stewards UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Zeigler Coal Co. v. KleppeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Rasmussen v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Tanner v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Dulal ChatterjiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. James W. Barker v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. Total Terminals International, LLC v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs, EtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. Dulal ChatterjiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API