Legal Opinion

Dick's Restaurant & Bar, Inc. v. Rosenwasser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Dore, J., concurs to affirm as follows: On the motion to dismiss for insufficiency under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice we must assume the truth of all allegations of the complaint factually setting forth that the arbitration in question was merely pro forma and a fabrication to evade the Emergency Rent Laws. If this is so, the arbitration was entirely null and void, the provisions of section 1463 of the Civil PraeHce Act are not applicable and in such case the arbitration and the order confirming it may, if proper proof is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dick's Restaurant & Bar, Inc. v. RosenwasserNew York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API