Legal Opinion

Kuhn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1928No. 5162PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

Upon a re-examination of the record, we have concluded that we were in error in holding the evidence sufficient to warrant a finding beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant Moon participated in the enterprise, with knowledge of its unlawful character. The most material circumstance against him is that he was on or about the Talbot the night the arms were taken on board. But they were in bo-xes or cases, and he may very well have been ignorant of the contents, or of their destination. We think, too, we failed to attach due significance to the fact that Borresen, who…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Peter InsanaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. Minner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. United States v. Wilson TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Robert Blackwood and Tobias CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Curtis Taylor v. The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API