State v. Larson
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurrence · HillHill, J.
(concurring in the result)—I concur in the result. It should be made clear that the court reporter’s notes have *68been lost* 1 and, consequently, the wealthiest defendant in the state could not procure a verbatim statement of facts. We are, therefore, not concerned with any handicap because of indigency, but only with the issue of whether the narrative statement of facts, which can be furnished, is adequate for the presentation of the appeal.
Like counsel for the appellant on this appeal, who was not present at the trial, I cannot say that the narrative statement of facts is adequate for the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Ott.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Glaser v. HoldorfWashington Supreme Court · 1958