People v. Rivera
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
We agree with the Appellate Division that the evidence against defendant was insufficient to prove criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree. While the proof established that defendant knew the car in which he was observed was stolen, there was no evidence that he was in possession of it. Penal Law § 10.00 (8) defines "possess” as having "physical possession or otherwise to exercise dominion or control over tangible property”. Here, there was no showing that defendant exercised dominion or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. LuterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. LandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re R.K.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. KatendeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.