Legal Opinion

People v. Rivera

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 1993PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the evidence against defendant was insufficient to prove criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree. While the proof established that defendant knew the car in which he was observed was stolen, there was no evidence that he was in possession of it. Penal Law § 10.00 (8) defines "possess” as having "physical possession or otherwise to exercise dominion or control over tangible property”. Here, there was no showing that defendant exercised dominion or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. LuterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. LandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. People v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re R.K.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. KatendeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API