Legal Opinion
Bernard Kaplan and Alberto Berumen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1967No. 20728_1PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from convictions after a court trial of a five count indictment charging appellants and one other codefendant in Count I with conspiracy to pass counterfeit money (18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 472); Berumen in Counts II and IV with passing counterfeit money (18 U.S. C. § 472); Kaplan with aiding and abetting the passing of counterfeit money by the codefendant in Count III; and Kaplan and the codefendant with possession and concealment of counterfeit money in Count V.
All defendants were acquitted on Count I, Berumen convicted on Counts II and IV, and Kaplan…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. John Fioravanti, Nicholas Panaccione, and Angelo Pepe, Nicholas PanaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian S. H. WEINER, Marvin Al Lichtig and Solomon Block, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. John Michael HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Crespo de LlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.