Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Annunziato

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 20, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs in these two cases were injured in an automobile accident and recovered verdicts against the defendant, Andrews for $5848 and Wargo for $5863. The defendant moved to set the verdicts aside and has appealed from the denial of these motions. The only claim made before us is that the verdicts were excessive. In the Andrews case the jury might reasonably have found the following facts: He suffered a temporary concussion of the brain, cuts on the head and face, and bruises and abrasions; the bones of the side of his face were broken, resulting in an inability to close his jaws…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunstan v. Round Hill Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Phillips v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API