Young v. State

on appellant’s motion for rehearing.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant moves for. a rehearing, and sets out at length and logically his objections to the charge of the court for its failure, in terms, to connect with the charge on insanity an instruction specifically stating that the burden of proof was on the state to show appellant sane, beyond a reasonable doubt, at the time he committed the homicide, if he did. The court did instruct the jury clearly on the presumption of innocence, and told them that the burden of proof was on the state throughout, and, in connection with the charge on…