Legal Opinion

Klein v. Reid

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1980No. 273PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in concluding that this action is barred by the statute of limitations. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the lower court.

On January 26, 1979, appellant instituted this action in assumpsit. Appellees filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, contending that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The lower court sustained the preliminary objections and dismissed the complaint. This appeal followed.

“A demurrer admits every well-pleaded material fact set forth in the pleadings to which it is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gekas v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Lorah ex rel. Evans v. NissleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BarnessDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Nagle Engine & Boiler Works v. ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Appeal of HackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Packer Society Hill Travel Agency, Inc. v. Presbyterian University of Pennsylvania Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. A.J. Cunningham Packing Corp. v. Congress Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Beneficial Consumer Discount v. DaileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Driscoll, R. v. Arena, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. In Re Estate of SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API