Carter v. State

OPINION ON REHEARING.

HEUDERSON, Judge.

The State has made.a motion for rehearing, and contends that the court is in error in the original opinion, in regard to .the formation of the jury which tried appellant. We held that the jurors Foster, Barlow and Floeclc were not qualified jurors because they had not paid their poll tax; and we further held that inasmuch as appellant'was forced to challenge these jurors, and so exhausted his peremptory challenges, the court erred in forcing the juror McHeal on appellant, on his objection urged to said juror. On the first proposition we adhere to our…