Legal Opinion

Hiltop Sand Corp. v. Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following is the opinion of the referee:

Charles H. Street,

Referee. On May 3, 1923, the plaintiff and the defendant Emmett B. Simpson entered into a written contract under seal, relative to the sale by the plaintiff to said *469defendant of sand to be taken from certain premises on Queens boulevard near Forest Hills, L. I., which premises were leased by the plaintiff from the owner of the fee. By said contract the defendant Simpson was required to take from said property all of the sand sold by him in his business for delivery in a certain territory specified in the contract, and to pay for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. McKenzie v. . HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Schile v. . BrokhahusNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Coe v. . HobbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Smith v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bond, Mortgage & Securities Co. v. Surplus Wholesale Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  2. Pollack v. BriguglioCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API