Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Timothy L. Finley, Jr.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2016No. 2014AP002488-CRPublished

1DissentAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.

¶ 97. (dissenting). I do not join the majority opinion because I would not allow defendant Timothy Finley ("Finley") to withdraw his plea of no contest, for three reasons. First, the two misstatements in this case as to the maximum penalty applicable to Finley's plea, taken together, do not constitute a Bangert violation. Second, even if a Bangert violation could be said to have occurred in this case, the circuit court's finding subsequent to the Bangert hearing that Finley knew the maximum applicable penalty is not clearly erroneous. Third, even if a Bangert violation could be said to have…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API