Barlow v. Hertz Corp.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on December 21, 1988, which, inter alia, denied the defendant and third-party plaintiff’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 327, or, in the alternative, for an interlocutory order determining the applicability of California law, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Moskowitz, J., with costs.

In this situation, where the defendant has made no showing whatsoever that a California forum would best serve the ends of justice and the convenience of the parties, its motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds…