Legal Opinion

Brandin Slate Co. v. Fornea

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1938No. 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Judge.

The suit is to recover $311.10, the balance alleged to be due for shingles and roofing material sold defendant for recovering her home, which also includes an item of $10 for labor furnished for part of the work. The original order for the material, signed by the defendant, was for $385 worth of asbestos shingles and other material for the roofing. The order provides for the payment of $96.25 cash on delivery, and the balance in one, two and three months. After the order for the roofing was made out and signed, a memorandum was placed on the order, across the front, reading as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New Orleans & Carrollton Railroad v. DarmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  2. Dwight v. LintonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  3. McConnell v. Harris Chevrolet Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Capital City Ford CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Lacour v. MyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Segari v. UchelloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. United Engineering Co. of Louisiana v. DurbinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Smith v. BellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API