Legal Opinion

Jones v. Reus

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1894No. 129PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. W. W. King.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

Conclusions of Fact. — 1. That the land in controversy was a part of a one-half-league survey, patented November 20, 1873, to Hezekiah Bissell, assignee of Julian Diaz. That the one-half-league certificate by which this location and patent exist was an unlocated balance of a league and labor headright certificate number 66, issued to Julian Diaz, the other half having been located in 1841 or previously, and in 1841 this unlocated balance certificate was issued.

2. That in 1839 the certificate was conveyed by the administrator of Hezekiah Bissell’s estate to Enoch Jones,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moss v. Sanger Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Russell v. NallTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Humphreys v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Massie v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Grayson v. LoflandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Carlisle v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Mitchell v. StantonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API