Legal Opinion

Schneider v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 9, 1967No. 18710PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The instant appeal is ostensibly, though not effectually as. we shall herein point out, from three orders of the Court of Common Pleas for Richland County entered by two circuit judges, and one order of the Richland County Court, all denying the appellant relief in habeas corpus proceedings.

The facts of the case are pathetic, and by numerous habeas corpus proceedings and correspondence have been previously brought to the attention of the judiciary, both state and federal, as well as at least two governors of the state. It would serve no useful purpose to relate the facts in detail at this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  2. Wines v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schneider v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API