Legal Opinion
Gulick v. Fidelity & Guaranty Ins.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 2, 1951No. A-5575PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, District Judge.
On motion of defendant for summary judgment, it is shown beyond dispute: that plaintiff purchased from defendant a fire insurance policy, effective October 19, 1948, covering plaintiff’s automobile, containing a provision that the policy “does not apply while the automobile is used as a public conveyance;” that on or about November 13, 1948, the plaintiff, without notice to the defendant, entered into an agreement with a public taxicab company for use of the car as a taxicab; that the car was so used and Was never returned to the possession of the plaintiff; that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berryman v. Maryland Motor Car Ins.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Graham v. Standard Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Jackson v. Old Colony Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. BequetteDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1968
- Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Cordova Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Underwriters At Lloyd's Of London v. Cordova Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960