Legal Opinion

D'Amico v. Allstate Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding to determine the amount of the lien of Sulsky & Haber, P. C., on the proceeds of the underlying action, Sulsky & Haber, P. C. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), entered September 10, 1990, which, after a hearing, held that it was not entitled to any compensation for services rendered in the underlying action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Despite the appellant’s contentions, we find that the Supreme Court properly determined that the appellant was not entitled to a lien on the proceeds of the underlying action. It is well…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bernstein v. SosnowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API