Legal Opinion

Sparton Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 10, 2009No. 92-580 CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge.

In this patent infringement case, Plaintiff Sparton Corporation (“Sparton”) alleges that Defendant the United States (“the Government”), through the actions of the U.S. Navy, has used and/or caused the manufacture of sonar buoys that infringe U.S. Patent No. 3,921,120 (“the '120 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 4,029,233 (“the '233 patent”), both assigned to Sparton. The ease is now before the Court on the parties’ posttrial briefs. After a three-week trial held in 2008, the parties submitted supplemental briefs on the issues of infringement and the affirmative defense of…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API