Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. Cantonwine

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1923No. 17511PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

Tbe plaintiff bas appealed from a judgment dismissing bis action to foreclose bis farm laborer’s lien.

Tbe facts, wbicb are stipulated, are that, during tbe years 1920 and 1921, tbe defendant Cantonwine was engaged in farming certain lands in eastern Washington, belonging to one Pettyjohn, and one Ellerau, which lands be held under two separate leases. In tbe year 1921, that portion of tbe land wbicb belonged to El-lerau was in wheat and tbe Pettyjohn land was in stubble, to be plowed in tbe spring of 1921 for a crop in 1922, excepting that, on tbe last named land, a small portion thereof was…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Gooyer v. Northwest Trust & State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API