Legal Opinion

Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Elliott

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided August 18, 1942No. 114PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

The plaintiff Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc., filed this action to enjoin the defendant Rulie Elliott from operating a motor bus for the transportation of passengers for hire without having first obtained a certificate of convenience and necessity from the proper state authorities. The evidence was heard by the court and the action submitted for judgment.

" The plaintiff is a Delaware corporation operating a motor bus line for transportation of passengers for hire between Wickliffe, Kentucky, and Paducah, Kentucky, under a certificate of convenience and necessity issued by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Maritime Union of America v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  2. Family Motor Inn, Inc. v. L-K Enterprises Division Consolidated Foods Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API