Legal Opinion

Fox v. Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 5, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

Since in maintaining its streets a city is engaged in the performance of a governmental duty, it is not liable at common law to a highway laborer injured while in its employ. O’Brien v. Derry, 73 N. H. 198; Gates v. Milan, 76 N. H. 135. The workmen’s compensation act (P. L., c. 178) presupposes the existence of the common-law incidents of master and servant in those employments within its scope. Consequently a city by accepting the provisions of the act does not make itself subject thereto except in respect to those duties which it performs in a private corporate capacity.

It is stated in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dade v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  2. Newell v. MoreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API