Rios v. Norsworthy
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentAdams, Judge
Even though Rios’s behavior was clearly wrong — he was illegally and unsafely passing on a curve — Norsworthy was not absolved of all responsibility. He was required to maintain a diligent lookout. The majority’s opinion is based on the conclusion that, as a matter of fact, Norsworthy used ordinary care to maintain a diligent lookout. Because I believe there is an issue of fact on this question, I respectfully dissent.
The majority correctly explains that all drivers must exercise ordinary care to discover and avoid the consequences of another driver’s negligent conduct. Yet the majority…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Edwards v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966