Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rios v. Norsworthy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 2004No. A03A2411Published

1DissentAdams, Judge

Even though Rios’s behavior was clearly wrong — he was illegally and unsafely passing on a curve — Norsworthy was not absolved of all responsibility. He was required to maintain a diligent lookout. The majority’s opinion is based on the conclusion that, as a matter of fact, Norsworthy used ordinary care to maintain a diligent lookout. Because I believe there is an issue of fact on this question, I respectfully dissent.

The majority correctly explains that all drivers must exercise ordinary care to discover and avoid the consequences of another driver’s negligent conduct. Yet the majority…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Edwards v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API